The Ranger 165VS 2006 vs Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 measures 22,3 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 6,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Ranger 165VS 2006 at 16,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 tips the scales at 194 lbs — 182 lbs less than the Ranger 165VS 2006 at 12 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 250 hp, the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 has a 190-hp advantage over the Ranger 165VS 2006's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 carries 29 gallons versus 25 gallons in the Ranger 165VS 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Ranger 165VS 2006 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 22,3 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Ranger 165VS 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.