Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 boat specs
Rampage
Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Rampage 41 Express 2013 boat specs
Rampage
Rampage 41 Express 2013
2013
View full specs →

Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 vs Rampage 41 Express 2013: Same Brand, Different Boat

The Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 is a deep-V design and the Rampage 41 Express 2013 is a modified-V design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Rampage 41 Express 2013 measures 41,5 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 8,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 at 33,0 feet (2007). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rampage 41 Express 2013 tips the scales at 30 000 lbs - 12 800 lbs less than the Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 at 17 200 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Rampage 41 Express 2013 is rated for 13 passengers, while the Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 caps at 10. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Rampage 41 Express 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Rampage 41 Express 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water - it handles 13 passengers and at 41,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 10 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRampage
MakeRampage
Model33 Barta C.E.
Model41 Express
Model Year2007
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam13 ft.
Beam16 ft.
Beam - Meters3.96
Beam - Meters4.88
Beam - Inches156
Beam - Inches192
Bridge clearance - DetailHardtop: 10 ft. Upper Station: 18 ft.
Bridge clearance - DetailHardtop: 10 ft. 6 in. Upper Station: 18 ft. 3 in. Tuna Tower: 21 ft. 6 in.
Bridge clearance - Meters5.49
Bridge clearance - Meters6.55
Bridge clearance - Inches216
Bridge clearance - Inches258
Deadrise18℃
Deadrise12℃
Draft [max] - Detail29 in.
Draft [max] - Detail48 in.
Draft [max] - Meters0.74
Draft [max] - Meters1.22
Draft [max] - Inches29
Draft [max] - Inches48
Weight - Detail17,200 lbs.
Weight - Detail30,000 lbs.
Weight - kg7801.78
Weight - kg13607.76
Weight - lbs.17200
Weight - lbs.30000
Length - Feet33
Length - Feet41.5
Length overall - Detail33 ft. 0 in. 35 ft. 6 in. with integrated pulpit
Length overall - DetailHull: 41 ft. 6 in. With Integrated Pulpit: 44 ft.
Length overall - Meters10.82
Length overall - Meters13.41
Length overall - Inches426
Length overall - Inches528
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardTwin CAT? C7, 453.7 hp (460 mhp)
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail428 gal.
Fuel tank capacity - Detail700 gal.
Fuel tank capacity - Liters1620.16
Fuel tank capacity - Liters2649.79
Fuel tank capacity - Gal428
Fuel tank capacity - Gal700
Fuel typeDiesel
Fuel typeDiesel
Drive typeInboard - Twin
Drive typeInboard - Twin
Operational Info
HeadTechma? marine toilet system with integral maceator
Headnot available
Headroom6 ft. 6 in.
Headroom6 ft. 7 in.
Sleeping capacity6 adults
Sleeping capacity6 adults
Water capacityFresh: 30 gal.
Water capacity100 gal.
Water heater capacity6 gal.
Water heater capacitynot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail45 gal.
Holding tank capacity - Detail53 gal.
Holding tank capacity - Liters170.34
Holding tank capacity - Liters200.63
Holding tank capacity - Gal45
Holding tank capacity - Gal53
Storagenot available
StorageTransom Baitwell: 65 gal.

Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 vs Rampage 41 Express 2013 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 or the Rampage 41 Express 2013?
The Rampage 41 Express 2013 is the longer of the two at 41,5 feet overall. The Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 comes in at 33,0 feet, making it roughly 8,5 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 or the Rampage 41 Express 2013?
For trailering, the Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 has the edge at 17 200 lbs dry weight versus 30 000 lbs for the Rampage 41 Express 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 10 passengers, while the Rampage 41 Express 2013 is certified for 13. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing - on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rampage 41 Express 2013 measures 192" wide, compared to 156" for the Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states - anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank - the Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 or the Rampage 41 Express 2013?
The Rampage 41 Express 2013 has the bigger tank at 700 gallons, versus 428 gallons on the Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007. That 272-gallon difference translates to roughly 816–1360 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 and Rampage 41 Express 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Rampage 33 Barta C.E. 2007 and the Rampage 41 Express 2013 are built by Rampage. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.