Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 boat specs
Raider
Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008
2008
View full specs →
VS
Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009 boat specs
Raider
Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009
2009
View full specs →

Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 vs Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009 — A Close Look at Two Deep Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 and the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009 are deep vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 at 17,0 ft versus Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009 at 17,0 ft. At 119 lbs and 119 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 90 hp for the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 and 90 hp for the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 32 gal and 32 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 and Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeRaider
MakeRaider
ModelPro-Sport 172
ModelPro-Sport 172
Model Year2008
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam84 in
Beam84 in
Beam - Meters2.13
Beam - Meters2.13
Beam - Inches84
Beam - Inches84
Deadrise10℃
Deadrise10℃
Depth - Detail25 in
Depth - Detail25 in
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Inches25
Depth - Inches25
Weight - Detail1,190 lbs
Weight - Detail1,190 lbs
Weight - kg539.77
Weight - kg539.77
Weight - lbs.119
Weight - lbs.119
Height - DetailSide: 31 in
Height - DetailSide: 31 in
Height - Meters0.79
Height - Meters0.79
Height - Inches31
Height - Inches31
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet17
Length - Inches2
Length - Inches2
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Meters5.23
Length overall - Meters5.23
Length overall - Inches206
Length overall - Inches206
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail32 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail32 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters121.13
Fuel tank capacity - Liters121.13
Fuel tank capacity - Gal32
Fuel tank capacity - Gal32
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine maxProp: 90 hp Jet: 80 hp
Engine maxProp: 90 hp Jet: 80 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs
Maximum people5 or 750 lbs
Maximum people5 or 750 lbs

Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 vs Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 or the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009?
The Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 or the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009?
For trailering, the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009 has the edge at 119 lbs dry weight versus 119 lbs for the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 and Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009 share an 84 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 and Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 32 gallons and 32 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 and Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2008 and the Raider Pro-Sport 172 2009 are built by Raider. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.