The Princecraft 20 LPF 2006 vs Princecraft Sport 164 WS 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Princecraft Sport 164 WS 2013 measures 16,5 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 14,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Princecraft 20 LPF 2006 at 2,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Princecraft Sport 164 WS 2013 tips the scales at 1 008 lbs — 813 lbs less than the Princecraft 20 LPF 2006 at 195 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 90 hp for the Princecraft 20 LPF 2006 and 90 hp for the Princecraft Sport 164 WS 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Princecraft 20 LPF 2006 carries 33 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Princecraft Sport 164 WS 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Princecraft 20 LPF 2006 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Princecraft Sport 164 WS 2013 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Princecraft 20 LPF 2006 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Princecraft 20 LPF 2006 comes in at 2 lbs per hp versus 11 lbs per hp for the Princecraft Sport 164 WS 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.