The Princecraft 20 LP 2006 vs Princecraft PW1860VT 2008 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Princecraft PW1860VT 2008 measures 18,0 feet overall (2008), giving it roughly 16,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Princecraft 20 LP 2006 at 2,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Princecraft 20 LP 2006 tips the scales at 1 915 lbs — 1 320 lbs more than the Princecraft PW1860VT 2008 at 595 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Princecraft 20 LP 2006 has a 40-hp advantage over the Princecraft PW1860VT 2008's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Princecraft 20 LP 2006 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Princecraft PW1860VT 2008 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Princecraft 20 LP 2006 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Princecraft PW1860VT 2008 comes in at 12 lbs per hp versus 21 lbs per hp for the Princecraft 20 LP 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Princecraft 20 LP 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 11 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Princecraft PW1860VT 2008 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.