The Princecraft 20 L 2006 vs Princecraft Xpedition 170 WS 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Princecraft Xpedition 170 WS 2013 measures 16,9 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 14,9 additional feet of deck space compared to the Princecraft 20 L 2006 at 2,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Princecraft 20 L 2006 tips the scales at 1 775 lbs — 609 lbs more than the Princecraft Xpedition 170 WS 2013 at 1 166 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Princecraft Xpedition 170 WS 2013 has a 25-hp advantage over the Princecraft 20 L 2006's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Princecraft 20 L 2006 carries 33 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Princecraft Xpedition 170 WS 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Princecraft 20 L 2006 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Princecraft Xpedition 170 WS 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Princecraft 20 L 2006 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Princecraft Xpedition 170 WS 2013 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 20 lbs per hp for the Princecraft 20 L 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.