Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 boat specs
Polar
Polar 2300 CC Single 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Polar 2700 CC 2009 boat specs
Polar
Polar 2700 CC 2009
2009
View full specs →

Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 vs Polar 2700 CC 2009 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 vs Polar 2700 CC 2009 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Polar 2700 CC 2009 measures 27,3 feet overall (2009), giving it roughly 4,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 at 23,0 feet (2007). At 35 lbs and 5 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 600 hp, the Polar 2700 CC 2009 has a 300-hp advantage over the Polar 2300 CC Single 2007's 300-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 carries 15 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Polar 2700 CC 2009. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Polar 2700 CC 2009 at 27,3 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 at 23,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakePolar
MakePolar
Model2300 CC Single
Model2700 CC
Model Year2007
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam9 ft. 6 in. (2.9 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.9
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches114
Deadrise21℃
Deadrise21℃
Weight - Detail3,500 lbs. (1,587.6 kg)
Weight - Detail5,000 lbs. (2,268 kg)
Weight - kg1587.57
Weight - kg2267.96
Weight - lbs.35
Weight - lbs.5
Height [transom]25 in. (0.635 m)
Height [transom]25 in. (0.64 m)
Length - Meters7.11
Length - Meters8.33
Length - Feet23
Length - Feet27.33
Length - Inches4
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail23 ft. 4 in. (7.11 m)
Length overall - Detail27 ft. 4 in. (8.33 m)
Length overall - Meters7.11
Length overall - Meters8.33
Length overall - Inches28
Length overall - Inches328
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - DetailWith T-top: 98 in. (2.49 m) Without T-top: 80 in. (2.03 m)
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.49
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches98
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail23 in. (0.58 m)
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.58
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches23
Body / Hull
Hull materialComposite
Hull materialComposite
Hull typenot available
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail150 gal. (567.64 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail200 gal. (756.9 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters567.81
Fuel tank capacity - Liters757.08
Fuel tank capacity - Gal15
Fuel tank capacity - Gal2
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Engine max300 hp
Engine max600 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity4,500 lbs. (2,041.2 kg)
Maximum capacity5,000 lbs. (2,268 kg)
Maximum people8
Maximum people8
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity13 gal. (49.2 l)

Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 vs Polar 2700 CC 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 or the Polar 2700 CC 2009?
The Polar 2700 CC 2009 is the longer of the two at 27,3 feet overall. The Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 comes in at 23,0 feet, making it roughly 4,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 or the Polar 2700 CC 2009?
For trailering, the Polar 2700 CC 2009 has the edge at 5 lbs dry weight versus 35 lbs for the Polar 2300 CC Single 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Polar 2700 CC 2009 is rated to a maximum of 600 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 tops out at 300 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Polar 2700 CC 2009 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Polar 2700 CC 2009 measures 114" wide, compared to 102" for the Polar 2300 CC Single 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 or the Polar 2700 CC 2009?
The Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 has the bigger tank at 15 gallons, versus 2 gallons on the Polar 2700 CC 2009. That 13-gallon difference translates to roughly 39–65 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 and Polar 2700 CC 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Polar 2300 CC Single 2007 and the Polar 2700 CC 2009 are built by Polar. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.