Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010
2010
View full specs →

Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 vs Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 and the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 at 17,5 ft versus Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 at 16,3 ft. At 878 lbs and 778 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 75 hp for the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 and 75 hp for the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 16,3 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakePolar Kraft
MakePolar Kraft
ModelSportsman MV 1754 SE LTD
ModelV 164 SC
Model Year2012
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam86 in. (2.18 m)
Beam80 in. (2.03 m)
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Meters2.03
Beam - Inches86
Beam - Inches8
Depth - Detail20 in. (0.51 m)
Depth - Detail21 in. (0.53 m)
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inches2
Depth - Inches21
Weight - Detail878 lbs. (398 kg)
Weight - Detail778 lbs. (353 kg)
Weight - kg398.25
Weight - kg352.89
Weight - lbs.878
Weight - lbs.778
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 60 in. (1.52 m)
Width [transom] - Detail61 in. (1.55 m)
Height [transom]21 in. (0.53 m)
Height [transom]21 in. (0.53 m)
Length - Feet17.5
Length - Feet16.33
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in. (5.33 m)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 4 in. (4.96 m)
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Meters4.98
Length overall - Inches21
Length overall - Inches196
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.1 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull thickness0.072 in. (1.8 mm)
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max75 hp (55 kW)
Engine max75 hp (56 kW) Minimum: 25 hp (19 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,160 lbs. (526 kg)
Maximum capacity1,260 lbs. (572 kg)
Maximum people4 / 600 lbs. (272 kg)
Maximum people5 / 700 lbs. (318 kg)

Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 vs Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 or the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010?
The Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 is the longer of the two at 17,5 feet overall. The Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 comes in at 16,3 feet, making it roughly 1,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 or the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010?
For trailering, the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 has the edge at 778 lbs dry weight versus 878 lbs for the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 10 lbs per hp compared to 12 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 measures 86" wide, compared to 8" for the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 and Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1754 SE LTD 2012 and the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2010 are built by Polar Kraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.