Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007
2007
View full specs →

Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 vs Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 vs Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 at 18,0 ft versus Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 tips the scales at 1 094 lbs — 316 lbs more than the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 at 778 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 90 hp for the Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 and 75 hp for the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakePolar Kraft
MakePolar Kraft
ModelMV 182 FF
ModelV 164 SC
Model Year2007
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam85 in
Beam80 in
Beam - Meters2.16
Beam - Meters2.03
Beam - Inches85
Beam - Inches8
Depth - Detail23 in
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Centimeters58.42
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inches23
Depth - Inches21
Weight - Detail1,094 lbs
Weight - Detail778 lbs
Weight - kg496.23
Weight - kg352.89
Weight - lbs.1094
Weight - lbs.778
Width [transom] - Detail60 in
Width [transom] - Detail61 in
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Feet18
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Meters4.98
Length overall - Inches216
Length overall - Inches196
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches4
Body / Hull
Hull thickness.100 in
Hull thickness.072 in
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail17 gal. (64.35 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters64.35
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal17
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max90 hp Minimum: 40 hp
Engine max75 hp Minimum: 25 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,290 lbs
Maximum capacity1,260 lbs
Maximum people4
Maximum people5

Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 vs Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 or the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007?
The Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 or the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007?
For trailering, the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 has the edge at 778 lbs dry weight versus 1 094 lbs for the Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 is rated to a maximum of 90 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 tops out at 75 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 10 lbs per hp compared to 12 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 measures 85" wide, compared to 8" for the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 and Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Polar Kraft MV 182 FF 2007 and the Polar Kraft V 164 SC 2007 are built by Polar Kraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.