Polar Kraft MV 162 SC  2010 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007
2007
View full specs →

Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 vs Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 vs Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 at 16,2 ft versus Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 at 15,0 ft. At 751 lbs and 736 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 60 hp for the Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 and 50 hp for the Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 comes in at 13 lbs per hp versus 15 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 15,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakePolar Kraft
MakePolar Kraft
ModelMV 162 SC
ModelV 150 SC
Model Year201
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam78 in. (1.98 m)
Beam78 in
Beam - Meters1.98
Beam - Meters1.98
Beam - Inches78
Beam - Inches78
Depth - Detail23 in. (0.58 m)
Depth - Detail20 in
Depth - Centimeters58.42
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Inches23
Depth - Inches2
Weight - Detail751 lbs. (341 kg)
Weight - Detail736 lbs
Weight - kg340.65
Weight - kg333.84
Weight - lbs.751
Weight - lbs.736
Width [transom] - Detail54 in. (1.37 m)
Width [transom] - Detail60 in
Height [transom]21 in. (0.53 m)
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Feet16.17
Length - Feet15
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 2 in. (4.92 m)
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters4.93
Length overall - Meters4.57
Length overall - Inches194
Length overall - Inches18
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull thickness0.100 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull thickness.080 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - DetailN/A (portable)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max60 hp (45 kW)
Engine max50 hp Minimum: 15 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs. (499 kg)
Maximum capacity1,160 lbs
Maximum people4 / 600 lbs. (272 kg)
Maximum people5

Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 vs Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 or the Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007?
The Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 is the longer of the two at 16,2 feet overall. The Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 comes in at 15,0 feet, making it roughly 1,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 or the Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007?
For trailering, the Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 has the edge at 736 lbs dry weight versus 751 lbs for the Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 is rated to a maximum of 60 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 13 lbs per hp compared to 15 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 and Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 share an 78 in. (1.98 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Are the Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 and Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Polar Kraft MV 162 SC 2010 and the Polar Kraft V 150 SC 2007 are built by Polar Kraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.