Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013
2013
View full specs →

Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 vs Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 and the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 at 19,8 ft versus Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013 at 21,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 tips the scales at 1 836 lbs — 442 lbs more than the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013 at 1 394 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 has a 75-hp advantage over the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 carries 56 gallons versus 23 gallons in the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 and its 225-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013 with its 150-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakePolar Kraft
MakePolar Kraft
ModelKodiak 200 Pro WT
ModelOutlander 2010 SC
Model Year2013
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam98 in. (2.49 m)
Beam96 in. (2.44 m)
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches98
Beam - Inches96
Weight - Detail1,836 lbs. (834 kg)
Weight - Detail1,394 lbs. (633 kg)
Weight - kg832.79
Weight - kg632.31
Weight - lbs.1836
Weight - lbs.1394
Length - Feet19.83
Length - Feet20.96
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 10 in. (6.05 m)
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 11.5 in. (6.39 m)
Length overall - Meters6.05
Length overall - Meters6.4
Length overall - Inches238
Length overall - Inches251.5
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail56 gal. (212 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail23 gal. (87 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters211.98
Fuel tank capacity - Liters87.06
Fuel tank capacity - Gal56
Fuel tank capacity - Gal23
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max225 hp (168 kW)
Engine max150 hp (112 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum people6
Maximum people6

Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 vs Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 or the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013?
The Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013 is the longer of the two at 21,0 feet overall. The Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 comes in at 19,8 feet, making it roughly 1,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 or the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013?
For trailering, the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013 has the edge at 1 394 lbs dry weight versus 1 836 lbs for the Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 is rated to a maximum of 225 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013 tops out at 150 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 measures 98" wide, compared to 96" for the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 or the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013?
The Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 has the bigger tank at 56 gallons, versus 23 gallons on the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013. That 33-gallon difference translates to roughly 99–165 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 and Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Polar Kraft Kodiak 200 Pro WT 2013 and the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 SC 2013 are built by Polar Kraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.