Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013
2013
View full specs →

Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 vs Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 — Which Modified Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 and the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 measures 21,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 4,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 at 16,7 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 tips the scales at 1 372 lbs — 300 lbs less than the Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 at 1 072 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 130 hp for the Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 and 150 hp for the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 23 gal and 23 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 21,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakePolar Kraft
MakePolar Kraft
ModelKodiak 168 SC
ModelOutlander 2010 CC
Model Year2013
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam87 in. (2.21 m)
Beam96 in. (2.44 m)
Beam - Meters2.21
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches87
Beam - Inches96
Weight - Detail1,072 lbs. (487 kg)
Weight - Detail1,372 lbs. (623 kg)
Weight - kg486.25
Weight - kg622.33
Weight - lbs.1072
Weight - lbs.1372
Length - Feet16.67
Length - Feet20.96
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 8 in. (5.04 m)
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 11.5 in. (6.39 m)
Length overall - Meters5.08
Length overall - Meters6.4
Length overall - Inches2
Length overall - Inches251.5
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail23 gal. (87 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail23 gal. (87 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters87.06
Fuel tank capacity - Liters87.06
Fuel tank capacity - Gal23
Fuel tank capacity - Gal23
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max130 hp (96 kW)
Engine max150 hp (112 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum people5
Maximum people6

Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 vs Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 or the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013?
The Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 is the longer of the two at 21,0 feet overall. The Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 comes in at 16,7 feet, making it roughly 4,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 or the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013?
For trailering, the Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 has the edge at 1 072 lbs dry weight versus 1 372 lbs for the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 tops out at 130 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 measures 96" wide, compared to 87" for the Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 and Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 23 gallons and 23 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 and Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 and the Polar Kraft Outlander 2010 CC 2013 are built by Polar Kraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.