Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006
2006
View full specs →

Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 vs Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 vs Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 at 15,8 ft versus Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006 tips the scales at 686 lbs — 408 lbs less than the Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 at 278 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 60 hp, the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006 has a 35-hp advantage over the Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 comes in at 11 lbs per hp versus 11 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006 and its 60-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 with its 25-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakePolar Kraft
MakePolar Kraft
ModelJon MV 1648LWL
ModelSportsman MV 1680 SC
Model Year2013
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam68 in. (1.73 m)
Beam80 in
Beam - Meters1.73
Beam - Meters2.03
Beam - Inches68
Beam - Inches8
Weight - Detail278 lbs. (126 kg)
Weight - Detail686 lbs
Weight - kg126.1
Weight - kg311.16
Weight - lbs.278
Weight - lbs.686
Length - Feet15.75
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 9 in. (4.8 m)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Meters4.8
Length overall - Meters4.93
Length overall - Inches189
Length overall - Inches194
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail23 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters58.42
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches23
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail54 in
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches2
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull typeFlat
Hull typenot available
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thickness.100 in
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max25 hp (19 kW)
Engine max60 hp
Operational Info
Maximum people4
Maximum people4
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs

Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 vs Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 or the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006?
The Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 comes in at 15,8 feet, making it roughly 0,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 or the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006?
For trailering, the Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 has the edge at 278 lbs dry weight versus 686 lbs for the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006 is rated to a maximum of 60 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 11 lbs per hp compared to 11 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 measures 68" wide, compared to 8" for the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 and Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Polar Kraft Jon MV 1648LWL 2013 and the Polar Kraft Sportsman MV 1680 SC 2006 are built by Polar Kraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.