Matching a flat Polar Kraft Jon 1668 LW 2008 against a modified vee Polar Kraft MV 1585 SE 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft Jon 1668 LW 2008 at 15,0 ft versus Polar Kraft MV 1585 SE 2011 at 15,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Polar Kraft MV 1585 SE 2011 tips the scales at 778 lbs — 500 lbs less than the Polar Kraft Jon 1668 LW 2008 at 278 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 50 hp, the Polar Kraft MV 1585 SE 2011 has a 25-hp advantage over the Polar Kraft Jon 1668 LW 2008's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Polar Kraft Jon 1668 LW 2008 comes in at 11 lbs per hp versus 16 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft MV 1585 SE 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Polar Kraft MV 1585 SE 2011 and its 50-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Polar Kraft Jon 1668 LW 2008 with its 25-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.