The Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V142T 2005 vs Polar Kraft MV 1680 SE 2010 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V142T 2005 at 14,0 ft versus Polar Kraft MV 1680 SE 2010 at 16,2 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Polar Kraft MV 1680 SE 2010 tips the scales at 772 lbs — 208 lbs less than the Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V142T 2005 at 564 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 40 hp for the Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V142T 2005 and 60 hp for the Polar Kraft MV 1680 SE 2010. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Polar Kraft MV 1680 SE 2010 comes in at 13 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V142T 2005. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The Polar Kraft MV 1680 SE 2010 at 16,2 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V142T 2005 at 14,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.