Polar Kraft Dakota V1470  2006 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013
2013
View full specs →

Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 vs Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 vs Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 at 14,0 ft versus Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013 at 16,2 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013 tips the scales at 704 lbs — 678 lbs less than the Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 at 26 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 50 hp, the Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013 has a 25-hp advantage over the Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013 at 16,2 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 at 14,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakePolar Kraft
MakePolar Kraft
ModelDakota V147
ModelSportsman 1654 DB
Model Year2006
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam70 in
Beam80 in. (2.03 m)
Beam - Meters1.78
Beam - Meters2.03
Beam - Inches7
Beam - Inches8
Depth - Detail28 in
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters71.12
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches28
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail260 lbs
Weight - Detail704 lbs. (320 kg)
Weight - kg117.93
Weight - kg319.33
Weight - lbs.26
Weight - lbs.704
Width [transom] - Detail49.75 in
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]15 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet14
Length - Feet16.17
Length overall - Detail14 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 2 in. (4.93 m)
Length overall - Meters4.27
Length overall - Meters4.93
Length overall - Inches168
Length overall - Inches194
Body / Hull
Hull thickness.064 in
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max25 hp
Engine max50 hp (37 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity885 lbs
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people4
Maximum people4

Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 vs Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 or the Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013?
The Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013 is the longer of the two at 16,2 feet overall. The Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 comes in at 14,0 feet, making it roughly 2,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 or the Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013?
For trailering, the Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 has the edge at 26 lbs dry weight versus 704 lbs for the Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013 is rated to a maximum of 50 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 14 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013 measures 8" wide, compared to 7" for the Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 and Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Polar Kraft Dakota V1470 2006 and the Polar Kraft Sportsman 1654 DB 2013 are built by Polar Kraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.