Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006
2006
View full specs →

Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 vs Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 vs Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 at 17,0 ft versus Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006 tips the scales at 903 lbs — 866 lbs less than the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 at 37 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006 has a 50-hp advantage over the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012's 40-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006 and its 90-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 with its 40-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakePolar Kraft
MakePolar Kraft
ModelDakota V 1778 WB
ModelSportsman MV 1886 SC
Model Year2012
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam78 in. (1.98 m)
Beam86 in
Beam - Meters1.98
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Inches78
Beam - Inches86
Weight - Detail370 lbs. (168 kg)
Weight - Detail903 lbs
Weight - kg167.83
Weight - kg409.59
Weight - lbs.37
Weight - lbs.903
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet18
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 0 in. (5.19 m)
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inches204
Length overall - Inches216
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail23 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters58.42
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches23
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail60 in
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]20 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typenot available
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thickness.100 in
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max40 hp (30 kW)
Engine max90 hp
Operational Info
Maximum people5
Maximum people5
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity1,282 lbs

Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 vs Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 or the Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006?
The Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 or the Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006?
For trailering, the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 has the edge at 37 lbs dry weight versus 903 lbs for the Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006 is rated to a maximum of 90 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 tops out at 40 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 10 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006 measures 86" wide, compared to 78" for the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 and Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1778 WB 2012 and the Polar Kraft SPORTSMAN MV 1886 SC 2006 are built by Polar Kraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.