Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005
2005
View full specs →

Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 vs Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 vs Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 at 15,8 ft versus Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005 tips the scales at 756 lbs — 450 lbs less than the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 at 306 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 50 hp, the Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005 has a 25-hp advantage over the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 comes in at 12 lbs per hp versus 15 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005 and its 50-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 with its 25-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakePolar Kraft
MakePolar Kraft
ModelDakota V 167
ModelFISHERMAN V164 T
Model Year2013
Model Year2005
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam70 in. (1.78 m)
Beam80 in
Beam - Meters1.78
Beam - Meters2.03
Beam - Inches7
Beam - Inches8
Weight - Detail306 lbs. (139 kg)
Weight - Detail756 lbs
Weight - kg138.8
Weight - kg342.92
Weight - lbs.306
Weight - lbs.756
Length - Feet15.83
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 10 in. (4.83 m)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Meters4.83
Length overall - Meters4.98
Length overall - Inches19
Length overall - Inches196
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches21
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail61 in
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches4
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typenot available
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thickness.072 in
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max25 hp (19 kW)
Engine max50 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standard25 hp
Operational Info
Maximum people5
Maximum people5
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity1,205 lbs

Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 vs Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 or the Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005?
The Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 comes in at 15,8 feet, making it roughly 0,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 or the Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005?
For trailering, the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 has the edge at 306 lbs dry weight versus 756 lbs for the Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005 is rated to a maximum of 50 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 12 lbs per hp compared to 15 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005 measures 8" wide, compared to 7" for the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 and Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 2013 and the Polar Kraft FISHERMAN V164 T 2005 are built by Polar Kraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.