Matching a deep vee Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 L 2012 against a modified vee Polar Kraft Kodiak 190 WT 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 L 2012 at 15,8 ft versus Polar Kraft Kodiak 190 WT 2013 at 18,7 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Polar Kraft Kodiak 190 WT 2013 tips the scales at 1 619 lbs — 1 307 lbs less than the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 L 2012 at 312 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The Polar Kraft Kodiak 190 WT 2013 tops out at 200 hp. Engine specs for the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 L 2012 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Polar Kraft Kodiak 190 WT 2013 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 L 2012 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Polar Kraft Kodiak 190 WT 2013 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Polar Kraft Kodiak 190 WT 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 18,7 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 L 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.