Matching a deep vee Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 L 2012 against a modified vee Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 L 2012 at 15,8 ft versus Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 at 16,7 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 tips the scales at 1 072 lbs — 760 lbs less than the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 L 2012 at 312 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 tops out at 130 hp. Engine specs for the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 L 2012 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1670 L 2012 and Polar Kraft Kodiak 168 SC 2013 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.