Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013
2013
View full specs →

Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 vs Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 against a deep vee Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 measures 17,4 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 3,1 additional feet of deck space compared to the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 at 14,3 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 tips the scales at 1 051 lbs — 907 lbs more than the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 at 144 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 has a 75-hp advantage over the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013's 15-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 at 17,4 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 at 14,3 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakePolar Kraft
MakePolar Kraft
ModelBass TX 175 Pro
ModelDakota V 146
Model Year2012
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam84 in. (2.13 m)
Beam60 in. (1.52 m)
Beam - Meters2.13
Beam - Meters1.52
Beam - Inches84
Beam - Inches6
Weight - Detail1,051 lbs. (477 kg)
Weight - Detail144 lbs. (65 kg)
Weight - kg476.73
Weight - kg65.32
Weight - lbs.1051
Weight - lbs.144
Length - Feet17.42
Length - Feet14.33
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 5 in. (5.29 m)
Length overall - Detail14 ft. 4 in. (4.37 m)
Length overall - Meters5.31
Length overall - Meters4.37
Length overall - Inches209
Length overall - Inches172
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal. (91 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max90 hp (67 kW)
Engine max15 hp (11 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum people4
Maximum people4

Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 vs Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 or the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013?
The Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 is the longer of the two at 17,4 feet overall. The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 comes in at 14,3 feet, making it roughly 3,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 or the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013?
For trailering, the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 has the edge at 144 lbs dry weight versus 1 051 lbs for the Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 is rated to a maximum of 90 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 tops out at 15 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 10 lbs per hp compared to 12 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 measures 84" wide, compared to 6" for the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 and Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Polar Kraft Bass TX 175 Pro 2012 and the Polar Kraft Dakota V 1460 2013 are built by Polar Kraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.