Matching a modified vee Polar Kraft 1910 Pro TC 2010 against a deep vee Polar Kraft Kodiak Sport 170 FS 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft 1910 Pro TC 2010 at 19,8 ft versus Polar Kraft Kodiak Sport 170 FS 2013 at 17,1 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Polar Kraft 1910 Pro TC 2010 tips the scales at 1 836 lbs — 1 700 lbs more than the Polar Kraft Kodiak Sport 170 FS 2013 at 136 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Polar Kraft 1910 Pro TC 2010 has a 75-hp advantage over the Polar Kraft Kodiak Sport 170 FS 2013's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Polar Kraft Kodiak Sport 170 FS 2013 carries 23 gallons versus 6 gallons in the Polar Kraft 1910 Pro TC 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: The Polar Kraft 1910 Pro TC 2010 at 19,8 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Polar Kraft Kodiak Sport 170 FS 2013 at 17,1 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.