When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Polar Kraft 162 SC 2009 and the Polar Kraft Kodiak 190 WT 2013 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft 162 SC 2009 at 16,0 ft versus Polar Kraft Kodiak 190 WT 2013 at 18,7 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Polar Kraft Kodiak 190 WT 2013 tips the scales at 1 619 lbs — 868 lbs less than the Polar Kraft 162 SC 2009 at 751 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Polar Kraft Kodiak 190 WT 2013 has a 140-hp advantage over the Polar Kraft 162 SC 2009's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Polar Kraft Kodiak 190 WT 2013 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Polar Kraft 162 SC 2009 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Polar Kraft Kodiak 190 WT 2013 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Polar Kraft Kodiak 190 WT 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 18,7 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Polar Kraft 162 SC 2009 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.