Polar Kraft 150 T 2009 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft 150 T 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Polar Kraft Nor'Easter  V 163 DC 2012 boat specs
Polar Kraft
Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012
2012
View full specs →

Polar Kraft 150 T 2009 vs Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Polar Kraft 150 T 2009 and the Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Polar Kraft 150 T 2009 at 15,0 ft versus Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012 at 16,5 ft. At 68 lbs and 107 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012 has a 75-hp advantage over the Polar Kraft 150 T 2009's 40-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 2 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft 150 T 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012 and its 115-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Polar Kraft 150 T 2009 with its 40-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakePolar Kraft
MakePolar Kraft
Model150 T
ModelNor'Easter V 163 DC
Model Year2009
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam78 in
Beam93 in. (2.36 m)
Beam - Meters1.98
Beam - Meters2.36
Beam - Inches78
Beam - Inches93
Depth - Detail20 in
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches2
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail680 lbs
Weight - Detail1,070 lbs. (486 kg)
Weight - kg308.44
Weight - kg485.34
Weight - lbs.68
Weight - lbs.107
Width [transom] - Detail60 in
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet15
Length - Feet16.5
Length overall - Detail15 ft
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 6 in. (5.03 m)
Length overall - Meters4.57
Length overall - Meters5.03
Length overall - Inches18
Length overall - Inches198
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.080 in
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max40 hp Minimum: 15 hp
Engine max115 hp (86 kW)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail27 gal. (102 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters102.21
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal27
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,080 lbs
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people5 / 600 lbs
Maximum people5

Polar Kraft 150 T 2009 vs Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Polar Kraft 150 T 2009 or the Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012?
The Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012 is the longer of the two at 16,5 feet overall. The Polar Kraft 150 T 2009 comes in at 15,0 feet, making it roughly 1,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Polar Kraft 150 T 2009 or the Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012?
For trailering, the Polar Kraft 150 T 2009 has the edge at 68 lbs dry weight versus 107 lbs for the Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012 is rated to a maximum of 115 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Polar Kraft 150 T 2009 tops out at 40 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Polar Kraft 150 T 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 2 lbs per hp for the Polar Kraft 150 T 2009. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012 measures 93" wide, compared to 78" for the Polar Kraft 150 T 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Polar Kraft 150 T 2009 and Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Polar Kraft 150 T 2009 and the Polar Kraft Nor'Easter V 163 DC 2012 are built by Polar Kraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.