Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 boat specs
Pogo Structure
Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 boat specs
Pogo Structure
Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009
2009
View full specs →

Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 vs Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 vs Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 measures 40,0 feet overall (2009), giving it roughly 9,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 at 31,0 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 tips the scales at 9 921 lbs — 3 748 lbs less than the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 at 6 173 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 carries a rated maximum of 18 hp. Engine data for the Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 12 gal and 11 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 caps at 9. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 could be the deciding factor.

Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 displaces 9 921 lbs — a 3 748-lb difference over the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 at 6 173 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.

Draft is a practical consideration that many buyers underestimate until they're already at the marina. The Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 draws 9,1 ft, compared to 6,5 ft for the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013. That 2,6-foot difference affects which anchorages you can access, which haul-out facilities will take you, and how carefully you need to read the tide tables in shallower cruising grounds.

The Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 uses Sloop rigging. The Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 has a documented auxiliary engine of 18 hp.

Bottom line: The Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 9 921 lbs displacement and 40 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 at 6 173 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail31.00 ft
Length overall - Detail40.00 ft
Length - Feet31
Length - Feet40
Length overall - Meters9.45
Length overall - Meters12.19
Length overall - Inches372
Length overall - Inches480
Beam12.10 ft
Beam14.10 ft
Beam - Meters3.69
Beam - Meters4.3
Beam - Inches145
Beam - Inches169
Draft [max] - Detail6.50 ft
Draft [max] - Detail9.10 ft
Draft [max] - Meters1.98
Draft [max] - Meters2.77
Draft [max] - Inches78
Draft [max] - Inches109
Displacement6173.00 lbs
Displacement9921.00 lbs
Body / Hull
Rudder2 spade rudders
Rudder2 spade rudders
Helm2 tillers
Helm2 tillers
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal11.9
Fuel tank capacity - Gal10.6
Fuel tank capacity - Liters45.05
Fuel tank capacity - Liters40.13
Horsepower18 hp
Horsepowernot available
Drive typeinboard
Drive typenot available
Engine 2 Horsepowernot available
Engine 2 Horsepower30 hp
Engine 2 Drive Typenot available
Engine 2 Drive Typeinboard
Performance
Maximum speed7.32
Maximum speednot available
Maximum speed measureknots
Maximum speed measurenot available
Operational Info
Water capacity34.3
Water capacitynot available
RiggingSloop
RiggingSloop
Mast ConfigurationKeel stepped mast
Mast Configurationnot available
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail

Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 vs Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 or the Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009?
The Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 is the longer of the two at 40,0 feet overall. The Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 comes in at 31,0 feet, making it roughly 9,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 or the Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009?
For trailering, the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 has the edge at 6 173 lbs dry weight versus 9 921 lbs for the Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 has a documented max rating of 18 hp. Engine specifications for the Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 9 passengers, while the Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 is certified for 12. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 or the Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009?
The Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 has the deeper draft at 9,1 ft, versus 6,5 ft for the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 or the Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 at 9 921 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 at 6 173 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 measures 169" wide, compared to 145" for the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 and Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 12 gallons and 11 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 and Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Pogo Structure Pogo 30 Fin keel Fin keel 2013 and the Pogo Structure Pogo 40S2 2009 are built by Pogo Structure. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.