Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 boat specs
Pogo Structure
Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 boat specs
Pogo Structure
Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994
1994
View full specs →

Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 vs Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 vs Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 measures 34,5 feet overall (2007), giving it roughly 13,1 additional feet of deck space compared to the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 at 21,4 feet (1994). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 tips the scales at 7 937 lbs — 5 446 lbs more than the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 at 2 491 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 is rated for 10 passengers, while the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 could be the deciding factor.

Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 displaces 7 937 lbs — a 5 446-lb difference over the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 at 2 491 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.

Draft is a practical consideration that many buyers underestimate until they're already at the marina. The Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 draws 9,2 ft, compared to 5,2 ft for the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994. That 4,0-foot difference affects which anchorages you can access, which haul-out facilities will take you, and how carefully you need to read the tide tables in shallower cruising grounds.

The Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 uses Sloop rigging. Helm style differs too: the Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 uses a 2 tillers versus a 1 tiller on the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994. Wheel helms give better leverage and visibility on larger boats; tillers offer direct feedback and simplicity on smaller ones.

Hull speed is rated at 7,9 knots for the Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 and 6,2 knots for the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994.

Bottom line: The Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 7 937 lbs displacement and 35 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 at 2 491 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail34.50 ft
Length overall - Detail21.40 ft
Length - Feet34.5
Length - Feet21.4
Length overall - Meters10.52
Length overall - Meters6.52
Length overall - Inches414
Length overall - Inches257
Beam12.10 ft
Beam9.80 ft
Beam - Meters3.69
Beam - Meters2.99
Beam - Inches145
Beam - Inches118
Draft [max] - Detail9.20 ft
Draft [max] - Detail5.20 ft
Draft [max] - Meters2.8
Draft [max] - Meters1.58
Draft [max] - Inches110
Draft [max] - Inches62
Displacement7937.00 lbs
Displacement2491.00 lbs
Body / Hull
Rudder2 spade rudders
Rudder2 transom hung rudders
Helm2 tillers
Helm1 tiller
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal15.9
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters60.19
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Engine 2 Horsepower20 hp
Engine 2 Horsepowernot available
Engine 2 Drive Typeinboard
Engine 2 Drive Typenot available
Performance
Maximum speed7.86
Maximum speed6.19
Maximum speed measureknots
Maximum speed measureknots
Operational Info
Water capacity39.6
Water capacitynot available
RiggingSloop
RiggingSloop
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Mast ConfigurationKeel stepped mast
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail

Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 vs Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 or the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994?
The Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 is the longer of the two at 34,5 feet overall. The Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 comes in at 21,4 feet, making it roughly 13,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 or the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994?
For trailering, the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 has the edge at 2 491 lbs dry weight versus 7 937 lbs for the Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 10 passengers, while the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 or the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994?
The Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 has the deeper draft at 9,2 ft, versus 5,2 ft for the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 or the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 at 7 937 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 at 2 491 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which is the faster sailboat — the Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 or the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994?
Based on rated hull speed, the Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 has an edge at 7,9 knots versus 6,2 knots for the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994. Keep in mind that actual sailing speed depends heavily on wind conditions, sail trim, bottom condition, and skipper experience — hull speed is a theoretical maximum, not a guarantee.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 measures 145" wide, compared to 118" for the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 and Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Pogo Structure Pogo 10.50 Swing keel Swing keel 2007 and the Pogo Structure Pogo 6.50 1994 are built by Pogo Structure. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.