Nitro Z-9 2013 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-9 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009
2009
View full specs →

Nitro Z-9 2013 vs Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009: A Close Look at Two Modified-V Boats

Both the Nitro Z-9 2013 and the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 are modified-V designs, the first built in fibreglass and the second in aluminium, so the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Nitro Z-9 2013 at 20,8 ft versus Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 at 20,0 ft. At 2 100 lbs and 2 150 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class - either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling - 300 hp for the Nitro Z-9 2013 and 300 hp for the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Nitro Z-9 2013 carries 68 gallons versus 55 gallons in the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Nitro Z-9 2013 and Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeNitro
MakeNitro
ModelZ-9
ModelZ-9 CDC
Model Year2013
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in.
Beam96 in. (2.44 m)
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches96
Deadrise16°
Deadrisenot available
Depth - Detail19 in.
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters48.26
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches19
Depth - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Detail16 in.
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.41
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Inches16
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail2,100 lbs.
Weight - Detail2,150 lbs. (975 kg)
Weight - kg952.54
Weight - kg975.22
Weight - lbs.2100
Weight - lbs.2150
Height [transom]22.5 in.
Height [transom]22 in. (0.56 m)
Length - Feet20.75
Length - Feet20
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in.
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in. (6.33 m)
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Inches249
Length overall - Inches249
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters6.33
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches9
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeMercury®
Engine makenot available
Engine model225 OptiMax® Pro XS with Torque Master
Engine modelnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail68 gal.
Fuel tank capacity - Detail55 gal. (208 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters257.41
Fuel tank capacity - Liters208.2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal68
Fuel tank capacity - Gal55
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max300 hp
Engine max300 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardMercury? 225 OptiMax?
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,150 lbs.
Maximum capacity2,150 lbs. (975 kg)
Maximum people4 / 1,250 lbs.
Maximum people4 or 1,250 lbs. (567 kg)
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailNitro? color-coordinated tandem axle drive-on
Trailer - DetailNITRO? color coordinated tandem axle drive-on
Trailer - WeightPackage: 4,050 lbs.
Trailer - Weight4,050 lbs. (1,837 kg)
Trailer - WidthPackage: 8 ft. 6 in.
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over allWith swing-away: 24 ft. 5 in. (7.44 m)

Nitro Z-9 2013 vs Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Nitro Z-9 2013 or the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009?
The Nitro Z-9 2013 is the longer of the two at 20,8 feet overall. The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 comes in at 20,0 feet, making it roughly 0,8 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Nitro Z-9 2013 or the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009?
For trailering, the Nitro Z-9 2013 has the edge at 2 100 lbs dry weight versus 2 150 lbs for the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nitro Z-9 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing - on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Nitro Z-9 2013 and Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 share an 96 in. beam - meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank - the Nitro Z-9 2013 or the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009?
The Nitro Z-9 2013 has the bigger tank at 68 gallons, versus 55 gallons on the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009. That 13-gallon difference translates to roughly 39–65 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Nitro Z-9 2013 and Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Nitro Z-9 2013 and the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 are built by Nitro. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.