Nitro Z-7 2013 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-7 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011
2011
View full specs →

Nitro Z-7 2013 vs Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011: A Close Look at Two Modified-V Boats

Both the Nitro Z-7 2013 and the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 are modified-V designs, both built in fibreglass, so the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Nitro Z-7 2013 at 18,7 ft versus Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 at 20,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 tips the scales at 2 150 lbs - 500 lbs less than the Nitro Z-7 2013 at 1 650 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 has a 150-hp advantage over the Nitro Z-7 2013's 150-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 carries 55 gallons versus 41 gallons in the Nitro Z-7 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 at 20,8 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Nitro Z-7 2013 at 18,7 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking - a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeNitro
MakeNitro
ModelZ-7
ModelZ-9 CDC
Model Year2013
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam94 in.
Beam96 in.
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches94
Beam - Inches96
Deadrise16°
Deadrise16°
Depth - Detail19 in.
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters48.26
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches19
Depth - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Detail15 in.
Draft [max] - Detail16 in.
Draft [max] - Meters0.38
Draft [max] - Meters0.41
Draft [max] - Inches15
Draft [max] - Inches16
Weight - Detail1,650 lbs.
Weight - Detail2,150 lbs.
Weight - kg748.43
Weight - kg975.22
Weight - lbs.1650
Weight - lbs.2150
Height [transom]22.5 in.
Height [transom]22 in.
Length - Feet18.67
Length - Feet20.75
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 8 in.
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in.
Length overall - Meters5.69
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Inches224
Length overall - Inches249
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeMercury®
Engine makeMercury®
Engine model150 OptiMax® Pro XS
Engine model225 OptiMax®
Fuel tank capacity - Detail41 gal.
Fuel tank capacity - Detail55 gal.
Fuel tank capacity - Liters155.2
Fuel tank capacity - Liters208.2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal41
Fuel tank capacity - Gal55
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max150 hp
Engine max300 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,390 lbs.
Maximum capacity2,150 lbs.
Maximum people4 / 600 lbs.
Maximum people4 / 1,250 lbs.
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailNitro? color-coordinated single-axle drive-on
Trailer - DetailNITRO? color coordinated tandem axle drive-on
Trailer - WeightPackage: 3,200 lbs.
Trailer - Weight4,050 lbs.
Trailer - WidthPackage: 8 ft. 6 in.
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in.
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over allWith Swing-away: 24 ft. 5 in.

Nitro Z-7 2013 vs Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Nitro Z-7 2013 or the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011?
The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 is the longer of the two at 20,8 feet overall. The Nitro Z-7 2013 comes in at 18,7 feet, making it roughly 2,1 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Nitro Z-7 2013 or the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011?
For trailering, the Nitro Z-7 2013 has the edge at 1 650 lbs dry weight versus 2 150 lbs for the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 is rated to a maximum of 300 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Nitro Z-7 2013 tops out at 150 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that - matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nitro Z-7 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing - on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 measures 96" wide, compared to 94" for the Nitro Z-7 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states - anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank - the Nitro Z-7 2013 or the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011?
The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 has the bigger tank at 55 gallons, versus 41 gallons on the Nitro Z-7 2013. That 14-gallon difference translates to roughly 42–70 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Nitro Z-7 2013 and Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Nitro Z-7 2013 and the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 are built by Nitro. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.