Nitro X-5 2010 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro X-5 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Nitro Z-8 2013 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-8 2013
2013
View full specs →

Nitro X-5 2010 vs Nitro Z-8 2013 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Nitro X-5 2010 and the Nitro Z-8 2013 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Nitro X-5 2010 at 17,3 ft versus Nitro Z-8 2013 at 20,1 ft. At 13 lbs and 19 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 250 hp, the Nitro Z-8 2013 has a 135-hp advantage over the Nitro X-5 2010's 115-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Nitro Z-8 2013 carries 68 gallons versus 26 gallons in the Nitro X-5 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Nitro Z-8 2013 is rated for 4 passengers, while the Nitro X-5 2010 caps at 3. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Nitro Z-8 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Nitro Z-8 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 4 passengers and at 20,1 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Nitro X-5 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 3 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeNitro
MakeNitro
ModelX-5
ModelZ-8
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam90 in
Beam96 in
Beam - Meters2.29
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches9
Beam - Inches96
Deadrise12°
Deadrise16°
Draft [max] - Detail13 in
Draft [max] - Detail14 in
Draft [max] - Meters0.33
Draft [max] - Meters0.36
Draft [max] - Inches13
Draft [max] - Inches14
Weight - Detail1,300 lbs
Weight - Detail1,900 lbs
Weight - kg589.67
Weight - kg861.82
Weight - lbs.13
Weight - lbs.19
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]22 in
Length - Feet17.33
Length - Feet20.08
Length overall - Detail17.33 ft
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Meters5.28
Length overall - Meters6.12
Length overall - Inches207.96
Length overall - Inches241
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail19 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters48.26
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches19
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury? 90 ELPTO 2-stroke
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail26 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail68 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters98.42
Fuel tank capacity - Liters257.41
Fuel tank capacity - Gal26
Fuel tank capacity - Gal68
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max115 hp
Engine max250 hp
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury®
Engine modelnot available
Engine model200 L OptiMax® Pro XS
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs
Maximum capacity1,850 lbs
Maximum people3 / 460 lbs
Maximum people4 / 1,000 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailNITRO? color coordinated single axle drive-on
Trailer - DetailNitro? color-coordinated tandem axle drive-on
Trailer - Length over allWith swing-away: 18 ft. 11 in
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Weight2,360 lbs
Trailer - WeightPackage: 3,620 lbs
Trailer - Width8 ft
Trailer - WidthPackage: 8 ft. 6 in

Nitro X-5 2010 vs Nitro Z-8 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Nitro X-5 2010 or the Nitro Z-8 2013?
The Nitro Z-8 2013 is the longer of the two at 20,1 feet overall. The Nitro X-5 2010 comes in at 17,3 feet, making it roughly 2,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Nitro X-5 2010 or the Nitro Z-8 2013?
For trailering, the Nitro X-5 2010 has the edge at 13 lbs dry weight versus 19 lbs for the Nitro Z-8 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Nitro Z-8 2013 is rated to a maximum of 250 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Nitro X-5 2010 tops out at 115 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nitro X-5 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 3 passengers, while the Nitro Z-8 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Nitro Z-8 2013 measures 96" wide, compared to 9" for the Nitro X-5 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Nitro X-5 2010 or the Nitro Z-8 2013?
The Nitro Z-8 2013 has the bigger tank at 68 gallons, versus 26 gallons on the Nitro X-5 2010. That 42-gallon difference translates to roughly 126–210 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Nitro X-5 2010 and Nitro Z-8 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Nitro X-5 2010 and the Nitro Z-8 2013 are built by Nitro. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.