Nitro NX 898 2006 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro NX 898 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Nitro Z-7 2013 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-7 2013
2013
View full specs →

Nitro NX 898 2006 vs Nitro Z-7 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Nitro NX 898 2006 vs Nitro Z-7 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Nitro Z-7 2013 measures 18,7 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 16,7 additional feet of deck space compared to the Nitro NX 898 2006 at 2,0 feet (2006). At 176 lbs and 165 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Nitro NX 898 2006 has a 75-hp advantage over the Nitro Z-7 2013's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Nitro Z-7 2013 carries 41 gallons versus 5 gallons in the Nitro NX 898 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Nitro Z-7 2013 at 18,7 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Nitro NX 898 2006 at 2,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeNitro
MakeNitro
ModelNX 898
ModelZ-7
Model Year2006
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam93 in
Beam94 in
Beam - Meters2.36
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Inches93
Beam - Inches94
Weight - Detail1,760 lbs
Weight - Detail1,650 lbs
Weight - kg798.32
Weight - kg748.43
Weight - lbs.176
Weight - lbs.165
Height [transom]24 in
Height [transom]22.5 in
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet18.67
Length - Inches4
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 8 in
Length overall - Meters6.2
Length overall - Meters5.69
Length overall - Inches244
Length overall - Inches224
Deadrisenot available
Deadrise16°
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail19 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters48.26
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches19
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail15 in
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.38
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches15
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury? 150 OptiMax?
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail50 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail41 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters189.27
Fuel tank capacity - Liters155.2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal5
Fuel tank capacity - Gal41
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max225 hp
Engine max150 hp
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury®
Engine modelnot available
Engine model150 OptiMax® Pro XS
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,050 lbs
Maximum capacity1,390 lbs
Maximum people4
Maximum people4 / 600 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailMatching trailer w/EZ lube hubs, GalvaShield? frame and swing-away tongue
Trailer - DetailNitro? color-coordinated single-axle drive-on
Trailer - Length over allWith Transom Saver: 26 ft. 6 in. Without Transom Saver: 23 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Weight3,150 lbs
Trailer - WeightPackage: 3,200 lbs
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in
Trailer - WidthPackage: 8 ft. 6 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee

Nitro NX 898 2006 vs Nitro Z-7 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Nitro NX 898 2006 or the Nitro Z-7 2013?
The Nitro Z-7 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,7 feet overall. The Nitro NX 898 2006 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 16,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Nitro NX 898 2006 or the Nitro Z-7 2013?
For trailering, the Nitro Z-7 2013 has the edge at 165 lbs dry weight versus 176 lbs for the Nitro NX 898 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Nitro NX 898 2006 is rated to a maximum of 225 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Nitro Z-7 2013 tops out at 150 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nitro NX 898 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Nitro Z-7 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Nitro Z-7 2013 measures 94" wide, compared to 93" for the Nitro NX 898 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Nitro NX 898 2006 or the Nitro Z-7 2013?
The Nitro Z-7 2013 has the bigger tank at 41 gallons, versus 5 gallons on the Nitro NX 898 2006. That 36-gallon difference translates to roughly 108–180 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Nitro NX 898 2006 and Nitro Z-7 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Nitro NX 898 2006 and the Nitro Z-7 2013 are built by Nitro. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.