Nitro NX 750 SC  2005 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro NX 750 SC 2005
2005
View full specs →
VS
Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011
2011
View full specs →

Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 vs Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 vs Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 measures 20,8 feet overall (2011), giving it roughly 3,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 at 17,0 feet (2005). At 135 lbs and 215 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 has a 165-hp advantage over the Nitro NX 750 SC 2005's 135-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 carries 55 gallons versus 3 gallons in the Nitro NX 750 SC 2005. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 17,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeNitro
MakeNitro
ModelNX 750 SC
ModelZ-9 CDC
Model Year2005
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam86 in
Beam96 in
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches86
Beam - Inches96
Weight - Detail1,350 lbs
Weight - Detail2,150 lbs
Weight - kg612.35
Weight - kg975.22
Weight - lbs.135
Weight - lbs.215
Height [transom]22 in
Height [transom]22 in
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet20.75
Length - Inches6
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Inches21
Length overall - Inches249
Deadrisenot available
Deadrise16°
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail16 in
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.41
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches16
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail55 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56
Fuel tank capacity - Liters208.2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel tank capacity - Gal55
Engine max135 hp
Engine max300 hp
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury®
Engine modelnot available
Engine model225 OptiMax®
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,325 lbs
Maximum capacity2,150 lbs
Maximum people5
Maximum people4 / 1,250 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 6 in. (with Transom Saver) 22 ft. 6 in. (without Transom Saver)
Trailer - Length over allWith Swing-away: 24 ft. 5 in
Trailer - Weight2,295 lbs
Trailer - Weight4,050 lbs
Trailer - Width8 ft. 3 in
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailNITRO? color coordinated tandem axle drive-on
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee

Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 vs Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 or the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011?
The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 is the longer of the two at 20,8 feet overall. The Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 3,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 or the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011?
For trailering, the Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 has the edge at 135 lbs dry weight versus 215 lbs for the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 is rated to a maximum of 300 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 tops out at 135 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 measures 96" wide, compared to 86" for the Nitro NX 750 SC 2005. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 or the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011?
The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 has the bigger tank at 55 gallons, versus 3 gallons on the Nitro NX 750 SC 2005. That 52-gallon difference translates to roughly 156–260 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 and Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Nitro NX 750 SC 2005 and the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 are built by Nitro. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.