Nitro 929 CDX 2008 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro 929 CDX 2008
2008
View full specs →
VS
Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel  2005 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005
2005
View full specs →

Nitro 929 CDX 2008 vs Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Nitro 929 CDX 2008 vs Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 measures 21,0 feet overall (2005), giving it roughly 19,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Nitro 929 CDX 2008 at 2,0 feet (2008). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Nitro 929 CDX 2008 tips the scales at 1 919 lbs — 1 905 lbs more than the Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 at 14 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Nitro 929 CDX 2008 has a 100-hp advantage over the Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005's 200-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Nitro 929 CDX 2008 carries 57 gallons versus 6 gallons in the Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Nitro 929 CDX 2008 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 21,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Nitro 929 CDX 2008 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeNitro
MakeNitro
Model929 CDX
ModelBay 2200 Tunnel
Model Year2008
Model Year2005
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in
Beam99 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.51
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches99
Weight - Detail1,919 lbs
Weight - Detail1,400 lbs
Weight - kg870.44
Weight - kg635.03
Weight - lbs.1919
Weight - lbs.14
Height [transom]22 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet21
Length - Inches9
Length - Inches9
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Detail21 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Meters6.63
Length overall - Inches249
Length overall - Inches261
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury? 200 OptiMax?
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail57 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail60 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters215.77
Fuel tank capacity - Liters227.12
Fuel tank capacity - Gal57
Fuel tank capacity - Gal6
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Engine max300 hp
Engine max200 hp
Performance
Maximum speed66 - 68
Maximum speednot available
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,000 lbs
Maximum capacity1,950 lbs
Maximum people4
Maximum people9
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailNITRO? color-coordinated tandem axle drive-on
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over allwith Swing-Away: 22 ft. 8 in
Trailer - Length over all26 ft. 0 in
Trailer - Weight3,300 lbs
Trailer - Weight2,790 lbs
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Width101 in

Nitro 929 CDX 2008 vs Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Nitro 929 CDX 2008 or the Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005?
The Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 is the longer of the two at 21,0 feet overall. The Nitro 929 CDX 2008 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 19,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Nitro 929 CDX 2008 or the Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005?
For trailering, the Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 has the edge at 14 lbs dry weight versus 1 919 lbs for the Nitro 929 CDX 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Nitro 929 CDX 2008 is rated to a maximum of 300 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 tops out at 200 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nitro 929 CDX 2008 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 measures 99" wide, compared to 96" for the Nitro 929 CDX 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Nitro 929 CDX 2008 or the Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005?
The Nitro 929 CDX 2008 has the bigger tank at 57 gallons, versus 6 gallons on the Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005. That 51-gallon difference translates to roughly 153–255 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Nitro 929 CDX 2008 and Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Nitro 929 CDX 2008 and the Nitro Bay 2200 Tunnel 2005 are built by Nitro. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.