Nitro 929 CDX 2007 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro 929 CDX 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Nitro Z-9 2013 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-9 2013
2013
View full specs →

Nitro 929 CDX 2007 vs Nitro Z-9 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Nitro 929 CDX 2007 vs Nitro Z-9 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Nitro Z-9 2013 measures 20,8 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 18,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Nitro 929 CDX 2007 at 2,0 feet (2007). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Nitro 929 CDX 2007 tips the scales at 1 919 lbs — 1 898 lbs more than the Nitro Z-9 2013 at 21 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 300 hp for the Nitro 929 CDX 2007 and 300 hp for the Nitro Z-9 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Nitro Z-9 2013 carries 68 gallons versus 57 gallons in the Nitro 929 CDX 2007. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Nitro Z-9 2013 at 20,8 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Nitro 929 CDX 2007 at 2,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeNitro
MakeNitro
Model929 CDX
ModelZ-9
Model Year2007
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in
Beam96 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches96
Weight - Detail1,919 lbs
Weight - Detail2,100 lbs
Weight - kg870.44
Weight - kg952.54
Weight - lbs.1919
Weight - lbs.21
Height [transom]22 in
Height [transom]22.5 in
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet20.75
Length - Inches9
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Inches249
Length overall - Inches249
Deadrisenot available
Deadrise16°
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail19 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters48.26
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches19
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail16 in
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.41
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches16
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury? 225 OptiMax?
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail57 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail68 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters215.77
Fuel tank capacity - Liters257.41
Fuel tank capacity - Gal57
Fuel tank capacity - Gal68
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max300 hp
Engine max300 hp
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury®
Engine modelnot available
Engine model225 OptiMax® Pro XS with Torque Master
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,000 lbs
Maximum capacity2,150 lbs
Maximum people4
Maximum people4 / 1,250 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailNITRO? color-coordinated tandem axle drive-on
Trailer - DetailNitro? color-coordinated tandem axle drive-on
Trailer - Length over allWith Transom Saver: 24 ft. 5 in. Without Transom Saver: 23 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Weight3,300 lbs
Trailer - WeightPackage: 4,050 lbs
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in
Trailer - WidthPackage: 8 ft. 6 in

Nitro 929 CDX 2007 vs Nitro Z-9 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Nitro 929 CDX 2007 or the Nitro Z-9 2013?
The Nitro Z-9 2013 is the longer of the two at 20,8 feet overall. The Nitro 929 CDX 2007 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 18,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Nitro 929 CDX 2007 or the Nitro Z-9 2013?
For trailering, the Nitro Z-9 2013 has the edge at 21 lbs dry weight versus 1 919 lbs for the Nitro 929 CDX 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nitro 929 CDX 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Nitro Z-9 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Nitro 929 CDX 2007 and Nitro Z-9 2013 share an 96 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Nitro 929 CDX 2007 or the Nitro Z-9 2013?
The Nitro Z-9 2013 has the bigger tank at 68 gallons, versus 57 gallons on the Nitro 929 CDX 2007. That 11-gallon difference translates to roughly 33–55 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Nitro 929 CDX 2007 and Nitro Z-9 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Nitro 929 CDX 2007 and the Nitro Z-9 2013 are built by Nitro. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.