Nitro 929 CDX SC  2005 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005
2005
View full specs →
VS
Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009
2009
View full specs →

Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 vs Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 vs Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 at 2,0 ft versus Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 at 2,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 tips the scales at 1 919 lbs — 1 704 lbs more than the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 at 215 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 300 hp for the Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 and 300 hp for the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 57 gal and 55 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 6 lbs per hp for the Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 and Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeNitro
MakeNitro
Model929 CDX SC
ModelZ-9 CDC
Model Year2005
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Weight - Detail1,919 lbs
Weight - Detail2,150 lbs. (975 kg)
Weight - kg870.44
Weight - kg975.22
Weight - lbs.1919
Weight - lbs.215
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet2
Length - Inches9
Length - Inches9
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in. (6.33 m)
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Inches249
Length overall - Inches249
Beamnot available
Beam96 in. (2.44 m)
Beam - Metersnot available
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inchesnot available
Beam - Inches96
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]22 in. (0.56 m)
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters6.33
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail57 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail55 gal. (208 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters215.77
Fuel tank capacity - Liters208.2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal57
Fuel tank capacity - Gal55
Engine max300 hp
Engine max300 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardMercury? 225 OptiMax?
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,000 lbs
Maximum capacity2,150 lbs. (975 kg)
Maximum people4
Maximum people4 or 1,250 lbs. (567 kg)
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. 5 in. (with Transom Saver) 23 ft. 6 in. (without Transom Saver)
Trailer - Length over allWith swing-away: 24 ft. 5 in. (7.44 m)
Trailer - Weight3,300 lbs
Trailer - Weight4,050 lbs. (1,837 kg)
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailNITRO? color coordinated tandem axle drive-on
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee

Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 vs Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 or the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009?
The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 is the longer of the two at 2,0 feet overall. The Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 or the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009?
For trailering, the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 has the edge at 215 lbs dry weight versus 1 919 lbs for the Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 6 lbs per hp for the Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
What do the trailers weigh for the Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 and Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009?
The trailer for the Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 is listed at 3,300 lbs and the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 trailer at 4,050 lbs. (1,837 kg). Always add trailer weight to the boat's dry weight when checking your tow vehicle's gross trailer weight rating.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 and Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 57 gallons and 55 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 and Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Nitro 929 CDX SC 2005 and the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2009 are built by Nitro. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.