Nitro 901 CDX 2007 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro 901 CDX 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Nitro Z-7 2013 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-7 2013
2013
View full specs →

Nitro 901 CDX 2007 vs Nitro Z-7 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Nitro 901 CDX 2007 vs Nitro Z-7 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Nitro 901 CDX 2007 at 19,0 ft versus Nitro Z-7 2013 at 18,7 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Nitro 901 CDX 2007 tips the scales at 1 715 lbs — 1 550 lbs more than the Nitro Z-7 2013 at 165 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Nitro 901 CDX 2007 has a 50-hp advantage over the Nitro Z-7 2013's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Nitro 901 CDX 2007 carries 57 gallons versus 41 gallons in the Nitro Z-7 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Nitro 901 CDX 2007 and its 200-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Nitro Z-7 2013 with its 150-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeNitro
MakeNitro
Model901 CDX
ModelZ-7
Model Year2007
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in
Beam94 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches94
Weight - Detail1,715 lbs
Weight - Detail1,650 lbs
Weight - kg777.91
Weight - kg748.43
Weight - lbs.1715
Weight - lbs.165
Height [transom]22 in
Height [transom]22.5 in
Length - Feet19
Length - Feet18.67
Length - Inches2
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 8 in
Length overall - Meters5.84
Length overall - Meters5.69
Length overall - Inches23
Length overall - Inches224
Deadrisenot available
Deadrise16°
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail19 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters48.26
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches19
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail15 in
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.38
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches15
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury? 200 OptiMax?
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail57 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail41 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters215.77
Fuel tank capacity - Liters155.2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal57
Fuel tank capacity - Gal41
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max200 hp
Engine max150 hp
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury®
Engine modelnot available
Engine model150 OptiMax® Pro XS
Operational Info
Storage47 cu. ft
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity1,800 lbs
Maximum capacity1,390 lbs
Maximum people4
Maximum people4 / 600 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailNITRO? color-coordinated single axle drive-on
Trailer - DetailNitro? color-coordinated single-axle drive-on
Trailer - Length over allwith Transom Saver: 23 ft. 8 in. Without Transom Saver: 22 ft. 8 in
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Weight3,200 lbs
Trailer - WeightPackage: 3,200 lbs
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in
Trailer - WidthPackage: 8 ft. 6 in

Nitro 901 CDX 2007 vs Nitro Z-7 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Nitro 901 CDX 2007 or the Nitro Z-7 2013?
The Nitro 901 CDX 2007 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The Nitro Z-7 2013 comes in at 18,7 feet, making it roughly 0,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Nitro 901 CDX 2007 or the Nitro Z-7 2013?
For trailering, the Nitro Z-7 2013 has the edge at 165 lbs dry weight versus 1 715 lbs for the Nitro 901 CDX 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Nitro 901 CDX 2007 is rated to a maximum of 200 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Nitro Z-7 2013 tops out at 150 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nitro 901 CDX 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Nitro Z-7 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Nitro 901 CDX 2007 measures 96" wide, compared to 94" for the Nitro Z-7 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Nitro 901 CDX 2007 or the Nitro Z-7 2013?
The Nitro 901 CDX 2007 has the bigger tank at 57 gallons, versus 41 gallons on the Nitro Z-7 2013. That 16-gallon difference translates to roughly 48–80 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Nitro 901 CDX 2007 and Nitro Z-7 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Nitro 901 CDX 2007 and the Nitro Z-7 2013 are built by Nitro. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.