Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005
2005
View full specs →
VS
Nitro Z-9 2010 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-9 2010
2010
View full specs →

Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 vs Nitro Z-9 2010: Same Brand, Different Boat

The Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 vs Nitro Z-9 2010 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story: intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 at 19,0 ft versus Nitro Z-9 2010 at 20,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Nitro Z-9 2010 tips the scales at 2 100 lbs - 385 lbs less than the Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 at 1 715 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Nitro Z-9 2010 has a 100-hp advantage over the Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005's 200-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Nitro Z-9 2010 carries 66 gallons versus 57 gallons in the Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Nitro Z-9 2010 and its 300-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 with its 200-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeNitro
MakeNitro
Model901 CDX SC
ModelZ-9
Model Year2005
Model Year2010
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in.
Beam96 in.
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches96
Weight - Detail1,715 lbs.
Weight - Detail2,100 lbs.
Weight - kg777.91
Weight - kg952.54
Weight - lbs.1715
Weight - lbs.2100
Height [transom]22 in.
Height [transom]22 in.
Length - Feet19
Length - Feet20.75
Length - Inches2
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 2 in.
Length overall - Detail20.75 ft.
Length overall - Meters5.84
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Inches230
Length overall - Inches249
Deadrisenot available
Deadrise16°
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail16 in.
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.41
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches16
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail57 gal.
Fuel tank capacity - Detail66 gal.
Fuel tank capacity - Liters215.77
Fuel tank capacity - Liters249.84
Fuel tank capacity - Gal57
Fuel tank capacity - Gal66
Engine max200 hp
Engine max300 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardMercury? 250 Pro XS OptiMax?
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Storage47 cu. ft.
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity1,235 lbs.
Maximum capacity2,150 lbs.
Maximum people4
Maximum people4 / 1,250 lbs.
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 8 in. (with Transom Saver) 22 ft. 8 in. (without Transom Saver)
Trailer - Length over allWith swing-away: 24 ft. 5 in.
Trailer - Weight3,200 lbs.
Trailer - Weight4,050 lbs.
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in.
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in.
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailNITRO? color coordinated tandem axle drive-on
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee

Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 vs Nitro Z-9 2010 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 or the Nitro Z-9 2010?
The Nitro Z-9 2010 is the longer of the two at 20,8 feet overall. The Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 comes in at 19,0 feet, making it roughly 1,8 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 or the Nitro Z-9 2010?
For trailering, the Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 has the edge at 1 715 lbs dry weight versus 2 100 lbs for the Nitro Z-9 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Nitro Z-9 2010 is rated to a maximum of 300 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 tops out at 200 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that - matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Nitro Z-9 2010 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing - on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 and Nitro Z-9 2010 share an 96 in. beam - meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank - the Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 or the Nitro Z-9 2010?
The Nitro Z-9 2010 has the bigger tank at 66 gallons, versus 57 gallons on the Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005. That 9-gallon difference translates to roughly 27–45 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 and Nitro Z-9 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Nitro 901 CDX SC 2005 and the Nitro Z-9 2010 are built by Nitro. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.