Nitro 750 2007 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro 750 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Nitro Z-9 2013 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-9 2013
2013
View full specs →

Nitro 750 2007 vs Nitro Z-9 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Nitro 750 2007 vs Nitro Z-9 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Nitro Z-9 2013 measures 20,8 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 3,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Nitro 750 2007 at 17,0 feet (2007). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Nitro 750 2007 tips the scales at 135 lbs — 114 lbs more than the Nitro Z-9 2013 at 21 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Nitro Z-9 2013 has a 210-hp advantage over the Nitro 750 2007's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Nitro Z-9 2013 carries 68 gallons versus 3 gallons in the Nitro 750 2007. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Nitro Z-9 2013 at 20,8 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Nitro 750 2007 at 17,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeNitro
MakeNitro
Model75
ModelZ-9
Model Year2007
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam86 in
Beam96 in
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches86
Beam - Inches96
Weight - Detail1,350 lbs
Weight - Detail2,100 lbs
Weight - kg612.35
Weight - kg952.54
Weight - lbs.135
Weight - lbs.21
Height [transom]22 in
Height [transom]22.5 in
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet20.75
Length - Inches6
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Inches21
Length overall - Inches249
Deadrisenot available
Deadrise16°
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail19 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters48.26
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches19
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail16 in
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.41
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches16
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury? 90 ELPTO 2-stroke
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail68 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56
Fuel tank capacity - Liters257.41
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel tank capacity - Gal68
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max90 hp
Engine max300 hp
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury®
Engine modelnot available
Engine model225 OptiMax® Pro XS with Torque Master
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,425 lbs
Maximum capacity2,150 lbs
Maximum people4
Maximum people4 / 1,250 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailNITRO? color-coordinated single axle drive-on
Trailer - DetailNitro? color-coordinated tandem axle drive-on
Trailer - Length over allWith Transom Saver: 23 ft. 6 in. Without Transom Saver: 22 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Weight2,325 lbs
Trailer - WeightPackage: 4,050 lbs
Trailer - Width8 ft. 3 in
Trailer - WidthPackage: 8 ft. 6 in

Nitro 750 2007 vs Nitro Z-9 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Nitro 750 2007 or the Nitro Z-9 2013?
The Nitro Z-9 2013 is the longer of the two at 20,8 feet overall. The Nitro 750 2007 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 3,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Nitro 750 2007 or the Nitro Z-9 2013?
For trailering, the Nitro Z-9 2013 has the edge at 21 lbs dry weight versus 135 lbs for the Nitro 750 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Nitro Z-9 2013 is rated to a maximum of 300 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Nitro 750 2007 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nitro 750 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Nitro Z-9 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Nitro Z-9 2013 measures 96" wide, compared to 86" for the Nitro 750 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Nitro 750 2007 or the Nitro Z-9 2013?
The Nitro Z-9 2013 has the bigger tank at 68 gallons, versus 3 gallons on the Nitro 750 2007. That 65-gallon difference translates to roughly 195–325 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Nitro 750 2007 and Nitro Z-9 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Nitro 750 2007 and the Nitro Z-9 2013 are built by Nitro. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.