Nitro 640 2008 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro 640 2008
2008
View full specs →
VS
Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011
2011
View full specs →

Nitro 640 2008 vs Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Nitro 640 2008 and the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Nitro 640 2008 at 18,0 ft versus Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 at 20,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Nitro 640 2008 tips the scales at 1 092 lbs — 877 lbs more than the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 at 215 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 has a 210-hp advantage over the Nitro 640 2008's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 carries 55 gallons versus 24 gallons in the Nitro 640 2008. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 at 20,8 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Nitro 640 2008 at 18,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeNitro
MakeNitro
Model64
ModelZ-9 CDC
Model Year2008
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam84 in
Beam96 in
Beam - Meters2.13
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches84
Beam - Inches96
Weight - Detail1,092 lbs
Weight - Detail2,150 lbs
Weight - kg495.32
Weight - kg975.22
Weight - lbs.1092
Weight - lbs.215
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]22 in
Length - Feet18
Length - Feet20.75
Length - Inches5
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Meters5.61
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Inches221
Length overall - Inches249
Deadrisenot available
Deadrise16°
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail16 in
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.41
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches16
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury? 50 ELPTO 2-stroke
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail55 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Liters208.2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel tank capacity - Gal55
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max90 hp
Engine max300 hp
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury®
Engine modelnot available
Engine model225 OptiMax®
Performance
Maximum speed33 - 34
Maximum speednot available
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,080 lbs
Maximum capacity2,150 lbs
Maximum people4
Maximum people4 / 1,250 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailNITRO? color-coordinated single axle drive-on
Trailer - DetailNITRO? color coordinated tandem axle drive-on
Trailer - Weight1,806 lbs
Trailer - Weight4,050 lbs
Trailer - Width8 ft
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over allWith Swing-away: 24 ft. 5 in

Nitro 640 2008 vs Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Nitro 640 2008 or the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011?
The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 is the longer of the two at 20,8 feet overall. The Nitro 640 2008 comes in at 18,0 feet, making it roughly 2,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Nitro 640 2008 or the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011?
For trailering, the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 has the edge at 215 lbs dry weight versus 1 092 lbs for the Nitro 640 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 is rated to a maximum of 300 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Nitro 640 2008 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nitro 640 2008 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 measures 96" wide, compared to 84" for the Nitro 640 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Nitro 640 2008 or the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011?
The Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 has the bigger tank at 55 gallons, versus 24 gallons on the Nitro 640 2008. That 31-gallon difference translates to roughly 93–155 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Nitro 640 2008 and Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Nitro 640 2008 and the Nitro Z-9 CDC 2011 are built by Nitro. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.