Nitro 640 LX 2005 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro 640 LX 2005
2005
View full specs →
VS
Nitro Z-7 2013 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-7 2013
2013
View full specs →

Nitro 640 LX 2005 vs Nitro Z-7 2013: Same Brand, Different Boat

The Nitro 640 LX 2005 vs Nitro Z-7 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story: intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Nitro 640 LX 2005 at 16,0 ft versus Nitro Z-7 2013 at 18,7 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Nitro Z-7 2013 tips the scales at 1 650 lbs - 558 lbs less than the Nitro 640 LX 2005 at 1 092 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Nitro Z-7 2013 has a 60-hp advantage over the Nitro 640 LX 2005's 90-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Nitro Z-7 2013 carries 41 gallons versus 24 gallons in the Nitro 640 LX 2005. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Nitro Z-7 2013 at 18,7 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Nitro 640 LX 2005 at 16,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking - a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeNitro
MakeNitro
Model640 LX
ModelZ-7
Model Year2005
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam84 in.
Beam94 in.
Beam - Meters2.13
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Inches84
Beam - Inches94
Weight - Detail1,092 lbs.
Weight - Detail1,650 lbs.
Weight - kg495.32
Weight - kg748.43
Weight - lbs.1092
Weight - lbs.1650
Height [transom]21.5 in.
Height [transom]22.5 in.
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet18.67
Length - Inches4
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 4 in.
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 8 in.
Length overall - Meters4.98
Length overall - Meters5.69
Length overall - Inches196
Length overall - Inches224
Deadrisenot available
Deadrise16°
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail19 in.
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters48.26
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches19
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail15 in.
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.38
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches15
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal.
Fuel tank capacity - Detail41 gal.
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Liters155.2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel tank capacity - Gal41
Engine max90 hp
Engine max150 hp
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury®
Engine modelnot available
Engine model150 OptiMax® Pro XS
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,080 lbs.
Maximum capacity1,390 lbs.
Maximum people4
Maximum people4 / 600 lbs.
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 8 in. (with Transom Saver) 20 ft. 10 in. (without Transom Saver)
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Weight1,806 lbs.
Trailer - WeightPackage: 3,200 lbs.
Trailer - Width8 ft. 0 in.
Trailer - WidthPackage: 8 ft. 6 in.
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailNitro? color-coordinated single-axle drive-on
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee

Nitro 640 LX 2005 vs Nitro Z-7 2013 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Nitro 640 LX 2005 or the Nitro Z-7 2013?
The Nitro Z-7 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,7 feet overall. The Nitro 640 LX 2005 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 2,7 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Nitro 640 LX 2005 or the Nitro Z-7 2013?
For trailering, the Nitro 640 LX 2005 has the edge at 1 092 lbs dry weight versus 1 650 lbs for the Nitro Z-7 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Nitro Z-7 2013 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Nitro 640 LX 2005 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that - matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nitro 640 LX 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Nitro Z-7 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing - on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Nitro Z-7 2013 measures 94" wide, compared to 84" for the Nitro 640 LX 2005. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states - anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank - the Nitro 640 LX 2005 or the Nitro Z-7 2013?
The Nitro Z-7 2013 has the bigger tank at 41 gallons, versus 24 gallons on the Nitro 640 LX 2005. That 17-gallon difference translates to roughly 51–85 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Nitro 640 LX 2005 and Nitro Z-7 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Nitro 640 LX 2005 and the Nitro Z-7 2013 are built by Nitro. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.