Nitro 288 Sport 2007 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro 288 Sport 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Nitro Z-7 2013 boat specs
Nitro
Nitro Z-7 2013
2013
View full specs →

Nitro 288 Sport 2007 vs Nitro Z-7 2013: Same Brand, Different Boat

The Nitro 288 Sport 2007 vs Nitro Z-7 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story: intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Nitro 288 Sport 2007 at 20,0 ft versus Nitro Z-7 2013 at 18,7 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Nitro 288 Sport 2007 tips the scales at 1 805 lbs - 155 lbs more than the Nitro Z-7 2013 at 1 650 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Nitro 288 Sport 2007 has a 75-hp advantage over the Nitro Z-7 2013's 150-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads - 39 gal and 41 gal - so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Nitro 288 Sport 2007 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Nitro Z-7 2013 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Nitro 288 Sport 2007 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Nitro 288 Sport 2007 if your priority is putting more people on the water - it handles 7 passengers and at 20,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Nitro Z-7 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeNitro
MakeNitro
Model288 Sport
ModelZ-7
Model Year2007
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in.
Beam94 in.
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches94
Weight - Detail1,805 lbs.
Weight - Detail1,650 lbs.
Weight - kg818.73
Weight - kg748.43
Weight - lbs.1805
Weight - lbs.1650
Height [transom]22 in.
Height [transom]22.5 in.
Length - Feet20
Length - Feet18.67
Length - Inches1
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 1 in.
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 8 in.
Length overall - Meters6.12
Length overall - Meters5.69
Length overall - Inches241
Length overall - Inches224
Deadrisenot available
Deadrise16°
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail19 in.
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters48.26
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches19
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail15 in.
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.38
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches15
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury? 150 EFI
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail39 gal.
Fuel tank capacity - Detail41 gal.
Fuel tank capacity - Liters147.63
Fuel tank capacity - Liters155.2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal39
Fuel tank capacity - Gal41
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max225 hp
Engine max150 hp
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury®
Engine modelnot available
Engine model150 OptiMax® Pro XS
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,685 lbs.
Maximum capacity1,390 lbs.
Maximum people7
Maximum people4 / 600 lbs.
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailNITRO? color-coordinated single axle drive-on
Trailer - DetailNitro? color-coordinated single-axle drive-on
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 0 in.
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Weight3,180 lbs.
Trailer - WeightPackage: 3,200 lbs.
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in.
Trailer - WidthPackage: 8 ft. 6 in.

Nitro 288 Sport 2007 vs Nitro Z-7 2013 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Nitro 288 Sport 2007 or the Nitro Z-7 2013?
The Nitro 288 Sport 2007 is the longer of the two at 20,0 feet overall. The Nitro Z-7 2013 comes in at 18,7 feet, making it roughly 1,3 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Nitro 288 Sport 2007 or the Nitro Z-7 2013?
For trailering, the Nitro Z-7 2013 has the edge at 1 650 lbs dry weight versus 1 805 lbs for the Nitro 288 Sport 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Nitro 288 Sport 2007 is rated to a maximum of 225 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Nitro Z-7 2013 tops out at 150 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that - matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nitro 288 Sport 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Nitro Z-7 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing - on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Nitro 288 Sport 2007 measures 96" wide, compared to 94" for the Nitro Z-7 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states - anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Nitro 288 Sport 2007 and Nitro Z-7 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads - 39 gallons and 41 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Nitro 288 Sport 2007 and Nitro Z-7 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Nitro 288 Sport 2007 and the Nitro Z-7 2013 are built by Nitro. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.