Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 boat specs
Nautor Swan
Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974
1974
View full specs →
VS
Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 boat specs
Nautor Swan
Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008
2008
View full specs →

Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 vs Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 vs Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 measures 66,0 feet overall (2008), giving it roughly 18,9 additional feet of deck space compared to the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 at 47,1 feet (1974). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 tips the scales at 66 139 lbs — 31 967 lbs less than the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 at 34 172 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 163 hp, the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 has a 102-hp advantage over the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974's 61-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 carries 343 gallons versus 53 gallons in the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 is rated for 20 passengers, while the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 caps at 14. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 could be the deciding factor.

Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 displaces 66 139 lbs — a 31 967-lb difference over the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 at 34 172 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.

Draft is a practical consideration that many buyers underestimate until they're already at the marina. The Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 draws 10,6 ft, compared to 5,1 ft for the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974. That 5,5-foot difference affects which anchorages you can access, which haul-out facilities will take you, and how carefully you need to read the tide tables in shallower cruising grounds.

The Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 uses Sloop rigging. Helm style differs too: the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 uses a 1 wheel versus a 2 wheels on the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008. Wheel helms give better leverage and visibility on larger boats; tillers offer direct feedback and simplicity on smaller ones. For auxiliary power the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 carries a 163-hp engine against 61 hp on the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974. Motoring range and ability to punch through a foul current or enter a tight marina under power will favour the more powerful installation.

Hull speed is rated at 10,1 knots for the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 and 8,1 knots for the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974.

Bottom line: The Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 66 139 lbs displacement and 66 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 at 34 172 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail47.10 ft
Length overall - Detail66.00 ft
Length - Feet47.1
Length - Feet66
Length overall - Meters14.36
Length overall - Meters20.12
Length overall - Inches565
Length overall - Inches792
Beam13.80 ft
Beam17.80 ft
Beam - Meters4.21
Beam - Meters5.43
Beam - Inches166
Beam - Inches214
Draft [max] - Detail5.11 ft
Draft [max] - Detail10.60 ft
Draft [max] - Meters1.56
Draft [max] - Meters3.23
Draft [max] - Inches61
Draft [max] - Inches127
Displacement34172.00 lbs
Displacement66139.00 lbs
Body / Hull
Rudder1 rudder on skeg
Rudder1 spade rudder
Helm1 wheel
Helm2 wheels
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal52.8
Fuel tank capacity - Gal343.4
Fuel tank capacity - Liters199.87
Fuel tank capacity - Liters1299.91
Horsepower61 hp
Horsepower163 hp
Drive typeinboard
Drive typeinboard
Performance
Maximum speed8.07
Maximum speed10.06
Maximum speed measureknots
Maximum speed measureknots
Operational Info
Water capacity92.5
Water capacitynot available
RiggingSloop
RiggingSloop
Mast ConfigurationKeel stepped mast
Mast ConfigurationKeel stepped mast
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail

Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 vs Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 or the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008?
The Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 is the longer of the two at 66,0 feet overall. The Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 comes in at 47,1 feet, making it roughly 18,9 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 or the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008?
For trailering, the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 has the edge at 34 172 lbs dry weight versus 66 139 lbs for the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 is rated to a maximum of 163 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 tops out at 61 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 is Coast Guard rated for 14 passengers, while the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 is certified for 20. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 or the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008?
The Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 has the deeper draft at 10,6 ft, versus 5,1 ft for the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 or the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 at 66 139 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 at 34 172 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which is the faster sailboat — the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 or the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008?
Based on rated hull speed, the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 has an edge at 10,1 knots versus 8,1 knots for the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974. Keep in mind that actual sailing speed depends heavily on wind conditions, sail trim, bottom condition, and skipper experience — hull speed is a theoretical maximum, not a guarantee.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 measures 214" wide, compared to 166" for the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 or the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008?
The Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 has the bigger tank at 343 gallons, versus 53 gallons on the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974. That 290-gallon difference translates to roughly 871–1452 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 and Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Nautor Swan Swan 47 Keel and centerboard Keel and centerboard 1974 and the Nautor Swan Swan 66 S 2008 are built by Nautor Swan. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.