Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 boat specs
Nauticat Yachts
Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999
1999
View full specs →
VS
Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 boat specs
Nauticat Yachts
Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967
1967
View full specs →

Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 vs Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 vs Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 at 32,1 ft versus Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 at 33,1 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 tips the scales at 16 535 lbs — 2 536 lbs less than the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 at 13 999 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 80 hp, the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 has a 41-hp advantage over the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999's 39-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 carries 159 gallons versus 66 gallons in the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 is rated for 10 passengers, while the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 caps at 9. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 could be the deciding factor.

Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 displaces 16 535 lbs — a 2 536-lb difference over the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 at 13 999 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.

Both boats draw a similar depth — 4,1 ft and 4,1 ft respectively. Marina access and anchorage options should be broadly equivalent between the two.

The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 is rigged as a Sloop while the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 carries ketch rigging — a meaningful difference in sail handling complexity, upwind performance, and the size of crew you'll need to work the boat comfortably. For auxiliary power the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 carries a 80-hp engine against 39 hp on the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999. Motoring range and ability to punch through a foul current or enter a tight marina under power will favour the more powerful installation.

Hull speed is rated at 7,1 knots for the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 and 7,0 knots for the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999. For extended cruising, water capacity matters: the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 carries 116 gallons versus 66 gallons on the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 — a significant advantage on longer passages where watermaker or provisioning stops aren't guaranteed.

Bottom line: The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 16 535 lbs displacement and 33 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 at 13 999 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail32.10 ft
Length overall - Detail33.10 ft
Length - Feet32.1
Length - Feet33.1
Length overall - Meters9.78
Length overall - Meters10.09
Length overall - Inches385
Length overall - Inches397
Beam10.70 ft
Beam10.80 ft
Beam - Meters3.26
Beam - Meters3.29
Beam - Inches128
Beam - Inches130
Draft [max] - Detail4.10 ft
Draft [max] - Detail4.10 ft
Draft [max] - Meters1.25
Draft [max] - Meters1.25
Draft [max] - Inches49
Draft [max] - Inches49
Displacement13999.00 lbs
Displacement16535.00 lbs
Body / Hull
Rudder1 semi-spade rudder
Rudder1 rudder on skeg
Helm2 wheels
Helm2 wheels
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal66
Fuel tank capacity - Gal158.5
Fuel tank capacity - Liters249.84
Fuel tank capacity - Liters599.99
Horsepower39 hp
Horsepower80 hp
Drive typeinboard
Drive typeinboard
Performance
Maximum speed6.99
Maximum speed7.12
Maximum speed measureknots
Maximum speed measureknots
Operational Info
Water capacity116.2
Water capacity66
RiggingSloop
Riggingketch
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail

Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 vs Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 or the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967?
The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 is the longer of the two at 33,1 feet overall. The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 comes in at 32,1 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 or the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967?
For trailering, the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 has the edge at 13 999 lbs dry weight versus 16 535 lbs for the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 is rated to a maximum of 80 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 tops out at 39 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 is Coast Guard rated for 9 passengers, while the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 is certified for 10. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 or the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967?
The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 has the deeper draft at 4,1 ft, versus 4,1 ft for the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 or the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 at 16 535 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 at 13 999 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which is the faster sailboat — the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 or the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967?
Based on rated hull speed, the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 has an edge at 7,1 knots versus 7,0 knots for the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999. Keep in mind that actual sailing speed depends heavily on wind conditions, sail trim, bottom condition, and skipper experience — hull speed is a theoretical maximum, not a guarantee.
Which boat is better equipped for long-distance cruising?
For extended passages, fresh water capacity is a key indicator of cruising readiness. The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 carries 116 gallons of fresh water compared to 66 gallons on the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 — a meaningful advantage when watermaker installations or port stops aren't guaranteed.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 measures 130" wide, compared to 128" for the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 or the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967?
The Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 has the bigger tank at 159 gallons, versus 66 gallons on the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999. That 92-gallon difference translates to roughly 277–462 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 and Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 321 Shoal draft Shoal draft 1999 and the Nauticat Yachts Nauticat 33 1967 are built by Nauticat Yachts. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.