MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 boat specs
MirroCraft
MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
MirroCraft Troller - 1677  2009 boat specs
MirroCraft
MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009
2009
View full specs →

MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 vs MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 — A Close Look at Two Deep Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 and the MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 are deep vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 at 16,0 ft versus MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 at 16,0 ft. At 124 lbs and 66 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 140 hp, the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 has a 65-hp advantage over the MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 is rated for 6 passengers, while the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeMirroCraft
MakeMirroCraft
ModelAggressor - 1753
ModelTroller - 1677
Model Year2009
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam93 in
Beam76 in
Beam - Meters2.36
Beam - Meters1.93
Beam - Inches93
Beam - Inches76
Weight - Detail1,240 lbs
Weight - Detail660 lbs
Weight - kg562.45
Weight - kg299.37
Weight - lbs.124
Weight - lbs.66
Height - Detail35 in
Height - Detail35 in
Height - Meters0.89
Height - Meters0.89
Height - Inches35
Height - Inches35
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet16
Length - Inches9
Length - Inches2
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Meters5.11
Length overall - Meters4.93
Length overall - Inches201
Length overall - Inches194
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessSide: 0.08 in. Bottom: 0.1 in
Hull thicknessSide: 0.08 in. Bottom: 0.08 in
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max140 hp
Engine max75 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,310 lbs
Maximum capacity1,290 lbs
Maximum people5
Maximum people6

MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 vs MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 or the MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009?
The MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 or the MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009?
For trailering, the MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 has the edge at 66 lbs dry weight versus 124 lbs for the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 is rated to a maximum of 140 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 tops out at 75 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 measures 93" wide, compared to 76" for the MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 and MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2009 and the MirroCraft Troller - 1677 2009 are built by MirroCraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.