MirroCraft 1877 2011 boat specs
MirroCraft
MirroCraft 1877 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006 boat specs
MirroCraft
MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006
2006
View full specs →

MirroCraft 1877 2011 vs MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The MirroCraft 1877 2011 vs MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — MirroCraft 1877 2011 at 17,8 ft versus MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006 at 17,0 ft. At 158 lbs and 128 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the MirroCraft 1877 2011 has a 25-hp advantage over the MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the MirroCraft 1877 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the MirroCraft 1877 2011 and its 175-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006 with its 150-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeMirroCraft
MakeMirroCraft
Model1877
ModelAggressor EXP - 1775
Model Year2011
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam97 in
Beam89 in
Beam - Meters2.46
Beam - Meters2.26
Beam - Inches97
Beam - Inches89
Depth - DetailBow: 40 in
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters101.6
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches4
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail1,580 lbs
Weight - Detail1,280 lbs
Weight - kg716.68
Weight - kg580.6
Weight - lbs.158
Weight - lbs.128
Height [transom]25 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet17.83
Length - Feet17
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Meters5.44
Length overall - Meters5.44
Length overall - Inches214
Length overall - Inches214
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Detail40 in
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Meters1.02
Height - Inchesnot available
Height - Inches4
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches1
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessSides: 0.100 in. Bottom: 0.125 in
Hull thicknessSide: .100 in. Bottom: .125 in
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail29 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters109.78
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal29
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max175 hp
Engine max150 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,600 lbs
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people6
Maximum people6

MirroCraft 1877 2011 vs MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the MirroCraft 1877 2011 or the MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006?
The MirroCraft 1877 2011 is the longer of the two at 17,8 feet overall. The MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 0,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the MirroCraft 1877 2011 or the MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006?
For trailering, the MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006 has the edge at 128 lbs dry weight versus 158 lbs for the MirroCraft 1877 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The MirroCraft 1877 2011 is rated to a maximum of 175 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006 tops out at 150 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The MirroCraft 1877 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the MirroCraft 1877 2011. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The MirroCraft 1877 2011 measures 97" wide, compared to 89" for the MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the MirroCraft 1877 2011 and MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the MirroCraft 1877 2011 and the MirroCraft Aggressor EXP - 1775 2006 are built by MirroCraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.