MirroCraft 1877 2011 boat specs
MirroCraft
MirroCraft 1877 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012 boat specs
MirroCraft
MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012
2012
View full specs →

MirroCraft 1877 2011 vs MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee MirroCraft 1877 2011 against a modified vee MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — MirroCraft 1877 2011 at 17,8 ft versus MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012 at 16,0 ft. At 158 lbs and 243 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the MirroCraft 1877 2011 has a 150-hp advantage over the MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The MirroCraft 1877 2011 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the MirroCraft 1877 2011 and its 175-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012 with its 25-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeMirroCraft
MakeMirroCraft
Model1877
Model4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman)
Model Year2011
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam97 in
Beam64 in
Beam - Meters2.46
Beam - Meters1.63
Beam - Inches97
Beam - Inches64
Depth - DetailBow: 40 in
Depth - DetailBow: 30 in
Depth - Centimeters101.6
Depth - Centimeters76.2
Depth - Inches4
Depth - Inches3
Weight - Detail1,580 lbs
Weight - Detail243 lbs
Weight - kg716.68
Weight - kg110.22
Weight - lbs.158
Weight - lbs.243
Height [transom]25 in
Height [transom]15 / 20 in
Length - Feet17.83
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters5.44
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches214
Length overall - Inches192
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessSides: 0.100 in. Bottom: 0.125 in
Hull thicknessSides: 0.064 in. Bottom: 0.064 in
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail29 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters109.78
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal29
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max175 hp
Engine max25 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,600 lbs
Maximum capacity1,120 lbs
Maximum people6
Maximum people6

MirroCraft 1877 2011 vs MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the MirroCraft 1877 2011 or the MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012?
The MirroCraft 1877 2011 is the longer of the two at 17,8 feet overall. The MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 1,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the MirroCraft 1877 2011 or the MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012?
For trailering, the MirroCraft 1877 2011 has the edge at 158 lbs dry weight versus 243 lbs for the MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The MirroCraft 1877 2011 is rated to a maximum of 175 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The MirroCraft 1877 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The MirroCraft 1877 2011 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 10 lbs per hp for the MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The MirroCraft 1877 2011 measures 97" wide, compared to 64" for the MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the MirroCraft 1877 2011 and MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the MirroCraft 1877 2011 and the MirroCraft 4656 (16 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2012 are built by MirroCraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.