Matching a deep vee MirroCraft 1677 2012 against a modified vee MirroCraft 4650 (14 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — MirroCraft 1677 2012 at 16,2 ft versus MirroCraft 4650 (14 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2013 at 14,2 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the MirroCraft 4650 (14 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2013 tips the scales at 195 lbs — 126 lbs less than the MirroCraft 1677 2012 at 69 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the MirroCraft 1677 2012 has a 50-hp advantage over the MirroCraft 4650 (14 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2013's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The MirroCraft 1677 2012 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 8 lbs per hp for the MirroCraft 4650 (14 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The MirroCraft 1677 2012 at 16,2 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The MirroCraft 4650 (14 ft. Deep Fisherman) 2013 at 14,2 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.