MirroCraft 1677 2010 boat specs
MirroCraft
MirroCraft 1677 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 boat specs
MirroCraft
MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008
2008
View full specs →

MirroCraft 1677 2010 vs MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 — A Close Look at Two Deep Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the MirroCraft 1677 2010 and the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 are deep vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — MirroCraft 1677 2010 at 16,2 ft versus MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 at 16,0 ft. At 66 lbs and 124 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 140 hp, the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 has a 65-hp advantage over the MirroCraft 1677 2010's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The MirroCraft 1677 2010 is rated for 6 passengers, while the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the MirroCraft 1677 2010 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the MirroCraft 1677 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the MirroCraft 1677 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 16,2 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeMirroCraft
MakeMirroCraft
Model1677
ModelAggressor - 1753
Model Year201
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam76 in
Beam93 in
Beam - Meters1.93
Beam - Meters2.36
Beam - Inches76
Beam - Inches93
Depth - DetailBow: 35 in
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters88.9
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches35
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail660 lbs
Weight - Detail1,240 lbs
Weight - kg299.37
Weight - kg562.45
Weight - lbs.66
Weight - lbs.124
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet16.17
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Meters4.93
Length overall - Meters5.11
Length overall - Inches194
Length overall - Inches201
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Detail35 in
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Meters0.89
Height - Inchesnot available
Height - Inches35
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches9
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessSide: 0.08 in. Bottom: 0.08 in
Hull thicknessSide: 0.08 in. Bottom: 0.1 in
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max75 hp
Engine max140 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,290 lbs
Maximum capacity1,310 lbs
Maximum people6
Maximum people5

MirroCraft 1677 2010 vs MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the MirroCraft 1677 2010 or the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008?
The MirroCraft 1677 2010 is the longer of the two at 16,2 feet overall. The MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 0,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the MirroCraft 1677 2010 or the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008?
For trailering, the MirroCraft 1677 2010 has the edge at 66 lbs dry weight versus 124 lbs for the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 is rated to a maximum of 140 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The MirroCraft 1677 2010 tops out at 75 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The MirroCraft 1677 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the MirroCraft 1677 2010. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 measures 93" wide, compared to 76" for the MirroCraft 1677 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the MirroCraft 1677 2010 and MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the MirroCraft 1677 2010 and the MirroCraft Aggressor - 1753 2008 are built by MirroCraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.