When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the MirroCraft 1676 2011 and the MirroCraft 1766 2013 are deep vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — MirroCraft 1676 2011 at 16,2 ft versus MirroCraft 1766 2013 at 17,3 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the MirroCraft 1676 2011 tips the scales at 655 lbs — 510 lbs more than the MirroCraft 1766 2013 at 145 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the MirroCraft 1766 2013 has a 90-hp advantage over the MirroCraft 1676 2011's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The MirroCraft 1766 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 11 lbs per hp for the MirroCraft 1676 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the MirroCraft 1766 2013 and its 150-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the MirroCraft 1676 2011 with its 60-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.