When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the MirroCraft 1676-O 2013 and the MirroCraft 3672 2012 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — MirroCraft 1676-O 2013 at 16,2 ft versus MirroCraft 3672 2012 at 16,2 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the MirroCraft 1676-O 2013 tips the scales at 655 lbs — 619 lbs more than the MirroCraft 3672 2012 at 36 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 60 hp for the MirroCraft 1676-O 2013 and 40 hp for the MirroCraft 3672 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The MirroCraft 3672 2012 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 11 lbs per hp for the MirroCraft 1676-O 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the MirroCraft 1676-O 2013 and its 60-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the MirroCraft 3672 2012 with its 40-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.