Matching a inflatable non rigid Mercury 310 Air Deck Hypalon 2012 against a inflatable rigid Mercury 350 Amanzi Hypalon 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Mercury 310 Air Deck Hypalon 2012 at 9,5 ft versus Mercury 350 Amanzi Hypalon 2013 at 11,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Mercury 350 Amanzi Hypalon 2013 tips the scales at 675 lbs — 582 lbs less than the Mercury 310 Air Deck Hypalon 2012 at 93 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 40 hp, the Mercury 350 Amanzi Hypalon 2013 has a 25-hp advantage over the Mercury 310 Air Deck Hypalon 2012's 15-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Mercury 310 Air Deck Hypalon 2012 comes in at 6 lbs per hp versus 17 lbs per hp for the Mercury 350 Amanzi Hypalon 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Mercury 350 Amanzi Hypalon 2013 and its 40-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Mercury 310 Air Deck Hypalon 2012 with its 15-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.